
Instituto Cipriano de Valera:
"Impartiality is impossible, and a documentary of the subjective vision of the filmmakers. This If our proposal is for the legitimate right to informal work. We are openly against local government intervention in the informal economy and against the policies pursued to criminalize social movements.
"We do not intend to do this, a pamphlet, not a tabloid story in the style of the national chains central government. We try to show viewers, the other side of the coin, they never took part in the news, the reality that we never imagined could exist and that we discovered as we went into the issue. "
" For the documentary conducted several interviews with informal union leaders, metropolitan and former metropolitan. We also support the HRC Billy Navarrete (Permanent Committee for Human Rights) who apart from giving us an interview, we provided information about cases of abuse. Apart from talks we analyze the issue with Xavier Andrade (urban anthropologist, FLACSO), Xavier Flores (Attorney, specializing in civil rights), Joselo Andrade (Economist, director of the Libertarian Movement). "
Yitux see the problem from a very close to the agora (The study or practice of human action, not aggressive, and voluntary exchanges prohibited by state):is right to recognize the value that is embarking on this enterprise as a whole, not without risks, and above all the honesty and courage of not mince words or hide behind labels "Politically correct" and talk about anarchism, now in the XXI century as the only coherent alternative to centuries of poverty and statism, that is all that can deliver the "consensus social democrat", so-called progressive and leftist. Similarly escaping from the conservatism that occurs as a friend of free markets, while instrumented to cut other essential freedoms, denying the enjoyment of property of a person on his body, or putting the Nazionale, collectivist also need, or the most anti-libertarian imperialism by the back door.
already focused more on the content of this first newsletter, I hope is only the first a long list, it can read the first editorial presenting the project without beating about the middle ground. In my opinion it is questionable positioning pro-electoral necessarily pointed to the text, but no one was alarmed: "Free Market" is presented, as mentioned above, opened for internal diversity and neolibertarios different positions that can only enrich us all . There will be room for other visions close as the agora or mutualism, through independent partnerships. We are not facing as sectarian project which we are accustomed other anarchists who apparently intended to monopolize the libertarian movement. With regard to the above contributions, just say that I am willing to tell between them from the next issue. Anyone else is encouraged?