addition to its curious resemblance to a very popular this holiday season (only missing the suit of coca-cola), the Russian prince has some interesting quotes:
"We see a race [referring to the legislators] made-up laws, legislating without knowing about that legislation, voting today on sanitation law populations, without the smallest notion of hygiene, tomorrow regulating the arms of the army, without find a gun, making laws about teaching and honest education of their children, legislation without rhyme or reason, but never forgetting the fine affecting the miserable, prison and galley men who harmed a thousand times less immoral than are themselves the legislators. We see, finally, the jailer the loss of human feeling to become police bloodhound, the spy, despising himself, the accusation turned under, built in system corruption, all the vices, all that is wrong favored human nature, cultivated for the triumph of the law. "
" And as we see all this, is why rather than foolishly repeat old formula "respect for the law!" scream "contempt for the law and its attributes!" These words mean: "Obey the law!", replace it with "Rebelaos against all laws!"
" There Are Many Varieties of libertarianism alive in the world today, But Remains Rothbardianism the center of intellectual gravity STI, STI primary muse and conscience, its strategic and moral core, and the focal point of debate even when its name is not acknowledged. The reason is that Murray Rothbard was the creator of modern libertarianism, a political-ideological system that proposes a once-and-for-all escape from the trappings of left and right and their central plans for how state power should be used. Libertarianism is the radical alternative that says state power is unworkable and immoral. "Mr. Libertarian," Murray N. Rothbard was called, and "The State's Greatest Living Enemy." He remains so".
Ciertamente el rothbardianismo is more alive than ever, even if some leftist Rothbardians not create much in its strategy for freedom, as in the core of the theory. It is easy to overlook the contradiction means-ends of the political reform.
Lew also said - based on the conventional definition of the "left" and that given the confusion, the definition of socialism of the Austrian school - the modern libertarianism did not originate as anti-left, but also as a reaction to the American conservative planning (including, inexplicably especially idolized Ronald Reagan):
"modern libertarianism was born not in reaction to socialism or leftism – though it is certainly anti-leftist (as the term is commonly understood) and antisocialist. Rather, libertarianism in the American historical context came into being in response to the statism of conservatism and its selective celebration of a conservative-style central planning. American conservatives may not adore the welfare state or excessive business regulation but they appreciate power exercised in the name of nationalism, warfarism, "pro-family" policies, and invasion of personal liberty and privacy. In the post-LBJ period of American history, it has-been Republican presidents more Democratic Than Ones Who Have Been responsible for the largest Expansions of executive and judicial power. It WAS pure liberty to defend Against the Commitments and corruptions of conservatism - beginning with Nixon and Reagan But Continuing with the Bush presidential - That inspired the birth of Rothbardian political economy. "
fact is today Rothbard fully present to the crisis of statism. Its greatest merit is to be able to combine several apparently conflicting traditions in favor of the cause of human freedom:
Yes, he had many predecessors from whom he drew: the whole of the classical-liberal tradition, the Austrian economists, the American antiwar tradition, and the natural-rights tradition. But it was he who put all these pieces together into a unified system that seems implausible at first but inevitable once it has been defined and defended by Rothbard. The individual pieces of the system are straightforward (self-ownership, strict property rights, free markets, anti-state in every conceivable respect) but the implications are earthshaking.
Freedom - A right I thought we had One that no one could take away But there are those who will try To rule the lives that you and I choose to lead We must fight - Injustice system Have no rights - Injustice system We must fight - Injustice system Have no rights - Injustice system There are those who change the laws For gain and furthering their needs A small group possesse the power A minority dictating what's good for the majority Money has the real influence Without it what we say don't make a difference I won't tell you to give in But to me there's got to be a better way to fight for our rights And to have our say To choose for ourselves And not be led around blindly on a short leash We must fight - Injustice system Have no rights - Injustice system We must fight - Injustice system Have no rights - Injustice system Freedom - A right I'll always have One that no one can take away No matter what it is they try Because the flame of freedom burns deep down inside of me
Institute Video: "Informal - for the right to work in peace "(Drive)
My friend Ernesto Yitux the rebellious Guayaquil blog is about to publish a documentary corealizado Andres Loor, retail trade of the economy in the gentle guayas, threatened by the brutality of mafia crime within local government.
Its creators are clearly opting for the defense of legitimate rights to free trade without government interference avid harmful to people's wealth:
"Impartiality is impossible, and a documentary of the subjective vision of the filmmakers. This If our proposal is for the legitimate right to informal work. We are openly against local government intervention in the informal economy and against the policies pursued to criminalize social movements.
"We do not intend to do this, a pamphlet, not a tabloid story in the style of the national chains central government. We try to show viewers, the other side of the coin, they never took part in the news, the reality that we never imagined could exist and that we discovered as we went into the issue. "
" For the documentary conducted several interviews with informal union leaders, metropolitan and former metropolitan. We also support the HRC Billy Navarrete (Permanent Committee for Human Rights) who apart from giving us an interview, we provided information about cases of abuse. Apart from talks we analyze the issue with Xavier Andrade (urban anthropologist, FLACSO), Xavier Flores (Attorney, specializing in civil rights), Joselo Andrade (Economist, director of the Libertarian Movement). "
Yitux see the problem from a very close to the agora (The study or practice of human action, not aggressive, and voluntary exchanges prohibited by state):
"the proposal is more than clear" NO YOU FUCK, let us work! ", If we put a dye that could translate into ideological" THE NO GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN THE ECONOMY, "the informal but do not know ideologically, are defending the free market, the real free market, which is outside the scope of the bureaucrats. "
"I do not believe in formality. To me, everyone should be informal. Working informally (in the broad sense of the word, they really are what we call informal informal retailers) is the only solution to delegitimize the state and coercion. I do not want the informal are formalized. I want to be left to work freely. " Presumably the network will be available in early 2009.
addition to its curious resemblance to a very popular this holiday season (only missing the suit of coca-cola), the Russian prince has some interesting quotes: 
